Home Page
Network Of European-Armenian Students

Home
News > Armenian Genocide (Source: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dikran.yegye/Genocide.htm )
News
Armenia Today 
Armenian Civilization 
Activities For Every Country
Armenian Youth
Armenian Hall Of Fame
Armenian In The World
Links
About Us
Related links and websites
the Forgotten
 
Genocide Facts [UN definition ]

 

 

 

 

 

The term was coined in 1943 by the Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin who combined the Greek word "genos" (race or tribe) with the Latin word "cide" (to kill).

defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: [Article Two of the UN convention]

1- Killing members of the group
2- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
3- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
4- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
5- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

  Turkish Historian reveals evidence about Armenian and Greek Genocides.

Monday, 7.3.2005
From the Greek Daily ‘Chronos’

The Deportation Law was being applied after a direct order from the Interior Ministry.

The Ottoman Empire pursued a policy of ethnic cleansing against Armenians and Greeks according to Turkish historian and Professor of the University of Sabanci, Halil Berktay whilst referring to historical Ottoman sources and documents. In an interview with the Turkish daily ‘Milliyet’ Professor Berktay calls the Balkan wars of 1912-13 a ‘turning point’.

‘As the Greek and Bulgarian Armies were marching towards Istanbul, the minorities in Peran were celebrating the victory. Before WWI had broken out, ethnic cleansing commenced against the Greeks. That is mentioned by the president of the Ottoman Parliament Halil Mentece in his memoirs, says Professor Berktay.’

‘Halil Mentece has also written in his memoirs that about 100000 Greeks fled to Greece ‘without a bleeding nose’. Similar events occurred in Izmir. Half-secret ethnic cleansing was being committed. These events were the weapon-free preparation for the elimination of the Armenians. Berktay does not think that this elimination had been planned at the time but eventually it did happen.

In 1912 it was possible that Istanbul would fall. Emver Pasha ordered the evacuation of the Ministry of War and its transfer to Anatolia (Ankara). At least Istanbul should be clear of any evidence that could betray Ottoman intensions. ‘The decision on deportations was made under those pressing psychological circumstances’ according to Professor Berktay.

When Berktay was asked whether the order for Armenian deportations was given by Talat or Emver Pasha, his answer was:

‘In my opinion Talat was more important that Emver. He was the brain behind the Unionists (i.e. of the organisation ‘Union and Progress’). During the era of Napoleon the Great the chief of secret police was Fouchet. Talat was like Fouchet. Talat convinced Emver and Jelal to turn against the Armenians. The latter made a big mistake in their calculations thinking that the Ottomans were bluffing and therefore did not take the threat seriously. The order had all Armenian subjects of the Empire as its target just because they were Armenian.

That is the deportation law did not say: We will just evacuate Eastern Anatolia. No. In 1915 Eastern Anatolia had no borders with the battleground areas. The law for deportation was clearly about Ethnic cleansing.
Professor Berktay mentioned that ‘the Deportation law was being applied directly after order was given by the Interior ministry and was not limited to the East of the Empire as it occurred in many most areas of the Empire. The fact that people were being deported just because they were Armenian corresponds to the definition of Genocide. Classified/secret orders were given by the paramilitary part of the ‘Union and Progress’ organisation in which Yakup, Cemil, Bahatin Sakir, Dr Recit etc took part’.

Professor Berktay believes that Kemal Ataturk was ‘clean’ because he was not involved in the deportation of Armenians as he was opposed to the ‘Union and Progress’ Organisation. Actually, he is said to have been hostile to Emver. Kemal Tahir (‘Union and Progress’) had even written that they had thought of eliminating Ataturk’. That’s why Professor Berktay thinks that the Republic of Turkey cannot be held responsible for the 1915 events. However, he says that the Prime minister or the Foreign Affairs minister could state that:
(1) there had been dark areas during the creation of the nation state,
(2) that the leadership of the ‘Union and Progress’ Organisation ordered the deportation of part of the Ottoman population resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives and
(3) that they are sorry about this historical event.

Finally, Prof. Berktay believes that people who are proposing that this case must go to the UN because it will prove the non-existence of an (Armenian) Genocide, are just bluffing.

Prof. Berktay was born in 1947. He finished his Undergraduate and postgraduate studies in Yale University and his PhD in the University of Birmingham. He has taught in the University of Ankara, the University of the Middle East and the University of Bosphorus. He is now a Professor in the School of Political science in the University of Sabanci.

   

Also to read

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We should not allow a ‘genocide of memory’ to happen

From the Daily Chronos (Greece) Thu, 25/11/04

The French-Greek expert in strategic studies Nikos Lygeros stated in a recent radio interview: ‘Real problems are created by the policies pursued by Turkey prohibiting the mentioning of the Armenian Genocide and eliminating all the historical documents and books that are related to the Armenian Question. The problem is made worse by countries that are not willing to prevent Turkey from doing so’. ‘We (Countries such as France and Greece) may not be responsible for the Armenian Genocide of 1915 but we are more responsible for a second genocide that is being committed, the genocide of memory’. Mr Lygeros has recently written a theatrical play about the Armenian Genocide titled ‘Five movements for silence’, that was immediately performed in Lyon, France. The play was excellent and touched the French (not French-Armenian) audience that gave it a standing ovation.

In this play, Mr lygeros emphasizes the threat of a second genocide; ‘the genocide of memory’ as he likes calling it. He believes that we are all participating in it by being neutral and passive. ‘Neutrality never helps the victims. It helps the killers…’
‘The Armenian Genocide (as a crime against Armenians and humanity) has not been recognized internationally. It has been recognized by 38 separate countries and the European Council (1987) but since it has not been accepted by the perpetrator (Turkey) it is a big problem awaiting resolution’.

Mr Lygeros believes that all the nations that have suffered such huge losses/ genocide should cooperate and avoid focusing on their genocide alone. He has studied in depth the problems of Cyprus and Greek Thrace. There are Armenian communities in both areas as well as in France where he lives and that made him look into the Armenian Genocide. The latter has made a comeback recently due to the negotiations taking place concerning the EU entry of Turkey.

The play was popular because it is related to the French culture, European Law and Human rights that are promoted by France. In addition there is a very large Armenian community in Lyon where there is now a large statue dedicated to the Armenian genocide. It was created by a French sculptor.

When the journalist asked Mr Lygeros…’what is worse than a genocide?’ his reply was:
‘ I believe that lack of recognition is worse.’ Most of you would wonder why se said that! Here comes the answer..
‘You could commit genocide because there is anger and hatred within a crowd or a nation (i.e. Turks) towards someone else/ another nation (i.e. Armenians) at some point in time. That can in some way be justified. The problem becomes even worse when the killer (i.e. Ottoman Turkey/ modern day Turkey) is now trying to prohibit any mention of the events in history books with its Law 306…’

’…Another problem is that Armenians have little proof of their existence in Turkey and virtually no proof of having properties there. It will, therefore, be very difficult to claim compensation if and when the genocide is recognized…’

.
 

Film About Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey Being Shot in Sweden

NEAST 23-07-2004

Armenian Genocide memorial in Yerevan
 

Swedish film directors Per Honewist and Susan Kardalian have started shooting a short documentary called "I hate dogs." It tells the story of an Armenian named Karpis, who survived the Armenian Genocide in 1915. Frames of documentaries, shot in 1950-1960 in cities of France and Iran, will be used in the film. Karpis is 98 now, but he still clearly remembers how he was driven away from Ottoman Turkey to deserts of Syria – along with his father, brother and thousands of other Armenians. On the way his father and brother died from hunger and emaciation. "There are not many of us – those who have survived the genocide – left, however I am not going to take my story to the grave," Karpis says. The cooperation between Per Honewist and Susan Kardalian started in 1988 with the film "Return to Ararat."

Copyright ©2003-2004 NEAST! Ins. All rights reserved. / Designed by Dikran Nakashian
NOTICE: We collect personal information on this site.
To learn more about how we use your information, see our Privacy Policy