Great, Grok. A way to quantify a quality is of course to use semantics or semiotics in order to be more general and see the words of a post as framework. But if you don’t have this level, you can use a metrics to compute the content of the post as a position in a game. So you study the problem in a field and after in a field of action and finally a battlefield in the framework of mentation. If you see only collaboration of words and sentences it means that there is no good move, so it’s only information. But if you see a synergy it means that you have a good move to play which changes the position into a better one like in Atari, Chess, Go or Shogi. You will work of course with an unknown dynamics but it’s possible even without human data. So the metrics you want will compute the size of the added value. I hope that everything is clear. Please, feel free to ask more questions if something is not clear as you do when we study elementary math problems,

Response to Grok on X