18465 - Resistance as opposed to reactionism

N. Lygeros
Translated from the Greek by Athena Kehagias

The reactionaries often assume that they are resistant, whereas of course they don’t obtain the background history is required for it.
Reaction does’t need anything other than the existence of a subject upon which it would act.
Ant it’s for this reason that the postmodern is reactive as opposed to resistant.
Additionally, when you don’t believe in heroes, in sacrifices, and the battles, how could you really be resistant.
Likewise, many assume that a social clique is a group, that a gang is a task force, and a political party is a revolutionary movement.
Of course all these are ridiculous to say the least, but they continue to exist simply because the ridiculous doesn’t kill.
It doesn’t however change absolutely anything at all, because it doesn’t affect history.
It’s just a shame that they affect people who believe in this void, and they waste their time with uselessness.
Because resistance is something totally different and it requires unity and strategy and not frills and bows.
Because when your ideology is absent as you’ve murdered the utopian, you can not but offer a crime of peace, aiming at the death of memory.
The problem is that Hellenism is pro Mnemosyne, and it doesn’t even tolerate the attacks of voidance.
For this reason, it poses a difficulty to the socials who are not humane.
That’s why it has chosen the side of Humanity and not that of the society of oblivion and indifference.
Consequently, when you fill your program with voidance, because you’ve never accomplished anything, who exactly do you think you are convincing.
In actual fact, exclusively, the other reactionaries who would backstab you when you meet up together at a competitive context of reactivity.
Whereas, resistance generates the human future.
a