In a negotiation there are critical criteria based upon which, the backbone of the agreement is determined. If such exist, then we must consider the subcomponent elements, otherwise it makes no sense.
So the critical criteria are the foundation for the development of a strategy which has an endurance because it was founded rationally.
In this case the critical criteria exist and are recognized by all sides.
Our issue is not therefore something new, but the continuation of a process without an irreversible pause.
The game continues at this time with multiple contacts, as the players see that there is some possibility for a solution to be found, as a balance, and this depends on the size of the cooperative magnitude and everyone’s contribution.
All those then, who have been polarized already, are not functioning rationally at all, and are not helping Greece in this critical instance.
Greece is not alone and we can observe that from movements which are indicative in regards to the whole context.
Therefore we continue the battle with the critical criteria, in order to know where we are heading off in the future as well, since our aim is not only for the day to pass through, but also for the dawn of the next day.