There should be an end to this unacceptable “viability” argument regarding the Cypriot solution.
It’s all about an euphemism, which skillfully puts accross the implication of compromise.
We are not opting for a compromised solution to a divorce.
The Cypriot issue is not a community issue, much to the dismay of some.
As far as Turkey is concerned, it’s simply a copy the of 1571 invasion and occupation.
All the artifice re: Turkish Cypriots are already known to us back from the Turkish-Cretans.
There’re no other categories, or something radical as an approach.
If there was a diplomatic possibility, Turkey would’ve grabbed the entire Cyprus in order to complete her fantasy.
And Cyprus’s accession to the European Union makes it in actual fact harder, at least for as long as the European Union is resistand to her own membership.
Because Turkey considers that many EU countries constitute her own vilayets, and its unacceptable according to her that they belong to the Western world, when they should be eastern.
As a matter of course, she acts out that the Byzantium is nonexistent, because otherwise, even her mere existence in the region would have no meaning whatsoever.
She relies upon the serviles who have no other word in their mouth, but “the sustainable, viable solution” .
But she forgets that the impalement can be viable and sustainable as well, as it prevents the victim from dying, and that constitutes one of the intertemporal qualities of the Ottomans for centuries on.
On the contrary, Hellenism is pro justice, even if that comes at a cost.
Because freedom is our priority.
It’s for that reason that during the National Revolution we’ve stated that our only choice is between freedom and death.
Of course many have forgotten, as they assume that the subsistence is work and viability is a solution.
But they forget that there are those who follow Evagoras directions.