One of the teachings of the Masters of Humanity is that the human relations should be strategic if we want then to be intertemporal and to acquire the characteristics of the bond.
Because the bond isn’t a restraint and doesn’t occur as a result of coercion.
It’s within this context that what must be, differs from what’s proper.
Strategy helps human relations to withstand internal tensions and external pressures.
With strategy, relations acquire durability.
Consequently, the issue in the long run, is not for relations to be ideal, as society wants to convince us, but resistant and durable, in order to belong within the network of Humanity .
If we were to examine the image of the neural network, and we opted for a structure transfer, then it becomes understood that this notion prognosticates that some synaptic relations should be established in order to utilize an ability which was merely a possibility, and it’s in actual fact those which the strategic human relations build up, because, not everything occurs randomly.
On the contrary, our choices, when they are made strategically, they could determine the data.
Quite simply, we shouldn’t see the world strictly on one chessboard.
The chessboards of the world are many and diverse.
There are rules, but they apply to a single species alone.
In this sense the more strategic games we are aware of, the more civilized we become, and that’s proportionate to the apothegm: the more languages we comprehend, the more humane we become.
Because humanism and civilization are essential abilities in order for us to belong to humanity