How ignorant and far from his field of authority, could a minister be, when he is trying to invent arguments in order to support the unacceptable?
Now we have an answer: absolutely.
Sometimes we are wondering if some have ever gone abroad, so that they can simply see, that what they are saying doesn’t actually exist.
A simple visitor of France and Belgium could without any difficulty observe that there are mosques in Paris and Lyon and certainly in Brussels as well.
Consequently, what is by him the mistake they’ve made in order to suffer terrorist attacks? And likewise, what’s that mistake for us to know and avoid, in order to distance ourselves from similar fate?
When with a scientific approach which characterizes a person who remained at the level of a third grade high school student, you are in the search for arguments in order to convince your nation, then you opt for obtaining some advice from someone who knows or who has at least traveled abroad, so as to avoid being ridiculed.
But in this case, if the ridiculous doesn’t kill you, then there’s no problem.
We had already heart “scientific statements’, which were later withdrawn, regarding the genocide of the Pontian Greeks.
Consequently, when the photographs of the mosques abroad will be discovered, there will most probably be a change of statement, or a somersault, in relation to his spectacular statements of irrelevance.
Additionally, for the extreme right positions of 1936 and 1967 to be used as arguments for someone who considers himself on the other side, it’s quite interesting to say the least, as it reminds us of the German-Soviet pact which was made between two people who thought of themselves as socialists, while It turned out to be that they were merely genociders.
But maybe this word is unknown as well to his Ministry.