Barbarity avoids bifurcation as a theory
but uses the splits as a way to stop
any democratic will to change.
When you use splits like this
how do you want
to be considered as democratic?
Each time that someone dares to criticize
the position of the party,
soon after we see a split.
When we see this
at all the levels of its structure
how can we hide
that it’s a problem of its foundation?
In reality,
there is nothing democratic in it.
So the question is simple.
How can we allow
this barbarity to fight freedom
and to be in our democracy
like any other democratic party?
Why this confusion?
For which reason?
Is it again a compromise?